"He was particularly worried about a revision that would change the definition of a household from “any number of individuals related by blood, marriage or adoption living together on the premises as a single housekeeping unit…,” plus up to “3 additional persons not related to household members” to one that would allow “adults of any relationship to live together as part of a household if they function as a ‘non-profit housekeeping unit."
Wait, are we back to the Equity and Inclusion Committee??? Or does this make anyone wonder about the effectiveness of such a committee?
If I'm reading this correctly, the revision being opposed is meant to create more affordable and equitable housing. I'm suggesting, somewhat sarcastically, that this is an example of the fact that having an Equity and Inclusion Committee won't address the variety of biases that exist.
Thanks for undertaking this project! It's good to know what is going on in Wauwatosa.
"He was particularly worried about a revision that would change the definition of a household from “any number of individuals related by blood, marriage or adoption living together on the premises as a single housekeeping unit…,” plus up to “3 additional persons not related to household members” to one that would allow “adults of any relationship to live together as part of a household if they function as a ‘non-profit housekeeping unit."
Wait, are we back to the Equity and Inclusion Committee??? Or does this make anyone wonder about the effectiveness of such a committee?
What do you mean?
If I'm reading this correctly, the revision being opposed is meant to create more affordable and equitable housing. I'm suggesting, somewhat sarcastically, that this is an example of the fact that having an Equity and Inclusion Committee won't address the variety of biases that exist.