4 Comments
User's avatar
Lois Marks's avatar

I agree with you wholeheartedly. My thoughts were the same about the measly sum of $5,000 dedicated to helping Tosans pay their medical bills, which help is apparently outside of the purview of a municipal government's responsibilities. This $300,000 allocation for a ("it is not a tank") vehicle should not be made. Let's have more community policing and attention paid to our infrastructure and roads.

Expand full comment
Lois Marks's avatar

Bearcat for $300,000? Ridiculous. One more step toward militarizing the police force.

Expand full comment
Andrew's avatar

Council had one of the most intense debates we ever had; over $5,000 of the previous year's council development funds for medical debt relief of Tosans, which failed, yet with little fanfare, we will spend $300,000 on this. What about getting all the new community service officers some gear for $300,000? Also, my district has plenty of potholes and a broken creek.

Escalation is not the answer in times of societal decay. I shake my head with all the stuff going on in the national news.

All this said, the new strategic plan we did feels like window dressing.

Expand full comment
Jordan M.'s avatar

There’s some precedent for the “not a tank” messaging. Fortunately the article makes clear that the differences between the BearCat and a tank are real, significant and important:

https://omaha.com/opinion/columnists/column-why-the-differences-between-a-bearcat-and-a-tank-are-important/article_83bf39a0-61f6-11ed-b41f-0f3cd1aa9473.html

Expand full comment